Read and Download Free eBooks
Categories












No books found.
Try another title or author.












Try another title or author.
Maja Łysienia compares the asylum jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union. The book asks how two courts working within different legal systems have addressed related questions and whether their decisions have produced converging standards.
After outlining international refugee law and the courts' respective roles, the study examines proceedings involving asylum seekers. Its central chapters compare protection against refoulement, immigration detention, and access to effective remedies, tracing the legal reasoning and references through which the courts engage with one another.
The concluding analysis identifies areas of agreement and divergence and considers explanations for their development. Readers will find a substantial comparative legal monograph with detailed case analysis, references, and a structured account of procedural as well as substantive questions. The complete publisher edition preserves hyperlinks to accessible legal materials.
Maja Łysienia. Seeking Convergence? A Comparative Analysis of the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union on Asylum. sui generis Verlag, 2022. https://doi.org/10.38107/027. CC BY4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Design: Müller+Hess, Basel. Original edition and all credits retained.